Abstract:
A satisfying conclusion is crucial for a good work of art, as it meets readers’ expectations and leaves them fulfilled. Such a conclusion enhances the artistic and commercial value of a work, as it allows readers to reflect and gain inspiration, increasing the likelihood of repeat reads and recommendations. However, it is not always necessary for all works, as conclusive endings may disrupt the ambiance and theme or make the work lack depth and realism. In such cases, open-ended conclusions may be preferable, allowing readers to interpret and imagine the story themselves, enhancing the artistic value and meaning of the work. Similarly, films and television shows may also benefit from open-ended conclusions, leaving a profound impact on the audience.
- Rickey, C., (2012) Perfectly happy, even without happy endings, The New York Times. The New York Times.Available from：https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/movies/lindsay-doran-examines-what-makes-films-satisfying.html [10 February,2023].
The idea that a good work does not necessarily require a happy ending is not new, and it has been discussed in various art forms, including movies. A New York Times article highlighted the view of Ms. Doran, who concluded that positive movies do not necessarily have happy endings. This observation is in line with my perspective on the topic. In fact, a non-happy ending may even enhance the artistic value of a work, as it can offer a more nuanced and complex portrayal of the human condition. It is also important to recognize that the audience’s expectation of an ending may vary depending on the genre, style, and cultural context of a work. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the ending of a work from multiple angles, considering its artistic, commercial, and thematic significance. Ultimately, a good work should leave a lasting impression on the audience, regardless of whether the ending is happy or not.